(Closed) Who would you choose to spend the rest of your life with?

posted 7 years ago in The Lounge
  • poll: Which guy would you choose?

    Rich guy

    Smart guy

    Hunky guy

    This was an easy decision.

    I really had to think about this.

  • Post # 32
    Member
    3400 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: July 2013

    I chose the rich guy only because you made him sound less boring than the hunky guy, and less ugly than the smart guy. So basically it seemed like the lesser of the evils.

    Not to mention, lots of vacations would be nice.

    Post # 33
    Member
    78 posts
    Worker bee
    • Wedding: August 2014

    Funny and kind are my top two.  I wouldn’t marry any body I wasn’t attracted to or thought was boring.

    Post # 34
    Member
    11517 posts
    Sugar Beekeeper
    • Wedding: May 2014

    okay so I also voted before I read your post.  BUT I would rather spend my life with someone smart who I could talk to and could make me laugh than someone who was dull, boring, and dumb.  Money and looks only get you so far. 

     

    Post # 35
    Member
    163 posts
    Blushing bee

    None.  I prefer a funny, laid-back guy.  

    Post # 36
    Member
    935 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: February 2014

    I didn’t even have to think

    RICH.

    You said he’s a nice guy, right?  So what if he’s not that attractive and boring.  I can keep myself entertained in any situation – especially if we have the means to travel.

    Post # 37
    Member
    7976 posts
    Bumble Beekeeper
    • Wedding: July 2013 - UK

    They all sound awful. Why would you marry anyone you found boring or unattractive? All bad choices in my eyes.

    Post # 38
    Member
    576 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: May 2015

    Rich guy. I’m not a horrible person, it’s just the sensible choice!

    The hot guy is pointless, no one stays hot.

    The smart guy is really tempting. I LOVE intellectuals!! But I think over the years I would be FURIOUS with him for refusing to become financially comfortable.

    A rich, sweet, dull person is actually a pretty decent partner. You could have a very interesting life!

    Post # 39
    Member
    893 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: December 2012

    View original reply
    @PromiseRooster:  +1

    with a lot of money life is never dull

    Post # 40
    Member
    7651 posts
    Bumble Beekeeper
    • Wedding: February 1997

    They’re all terrible choices. However, so many divorces occur due to money, and not having enough puts ANY marriage under incredible strain. But like a PP said, at least seeing the world and nice vacatins are possible with the rich man. Great conversation is great, yes, but not being attracted to the guy AND not being able to pay the bills would kill that relationship faster than I could say, “I don’t.”

    Post # 41
    Member
    4953 posts
    Honey bee
    • Wedding: October 2018

    After reading the other Bees responses, I have to agree with the rich guy answer. I could go on vacations and learn things, meet people to have stimulating conversations with, and I can cope with the lack of physical attraction.

    They’re still all terrible options. 

    Post # 42
    Member
    1671 posts
    Bumble bee
    • Wedding: October 2013

    @maureen0907:  Ooooh I would never choose in real life! But since you put a gun to my head, I will be forced to choose the hunky guy. I really had to think about it. I rate chemistry highly, DH and I have wonderful chemistry… But he also has a well paying job and is quite intelligent and funny.

    Anyways! The hunky guy. I chose him because I don’t mind not being well off as long as we are not starving or homeless. I have my own job, friends and hobbies. I think I could provide enough outside interests for us to not go crazy. If he was a bit boring, it’d just be a tiny bit more like being single… I would probably read more etc. and hang out with friends more. I’m assuming he has at least one or two interests… I suppose I would try and learn about them even if they seemed boring.

    I think sexy times are the only thing I couldn’t find some other good substitute for.

    no money? I can budget.

    not interesting/smart? I can entertain myself.

    Post # 43
    Member
    2481 posts
    Buzzing bee
    • Wedding: October 2012

    I  Went  with the rich guy cause honestly talking to some smaet guy or looking at a Handsom guy just wouldn’t do it for me . 

     

    Plua if he was rich we could learn to do fun things and I could entertain myself I’m also not a very sexual person so lucky for me it’s not that big of a deal .

    i enjoy doing stuff too much to be with someone who couldnt provide for me and my family. 

    also I wouldn’t be using the money for jewels and cars id be doing things with my kids traveling haviing needs met etc. its honestly so important in today’s world 

    Post # 44
    Member
    6738 posts
    Bee Keeper
    • Wedding: June 2014

    WHO VOTED THIS WAS EASY!? 

    Post # 45
    Hostess
    2997 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: April 2014

    Rich guy!  Maybe he can buy himSelf a personality 😉

    Post # 46
    Member
    304 posts
    Helper bee
    • Wedding: October 2015

    View original reply
    @BrandNewBride:  totally… if the options were “middle class” vs “rich” instead of “broke” it would be a little different. but honestly, I find wealth attractive – so long as he loves me. I would learn to love him over time. 

    The topic ‘Who would you choose to spend the rest of your life with?’ is closed to new replies.

    Find Amazing Vendors