(Closed) Why Jim Hjelm JH8962 & not JH8050

posted 6 years ago in Dress
  • poll: JH8962 or JH8050
    JH8962 : (30 votes)
    75 %
    JH8050 : (10 votes)
    25 %
  • Post # 3
    250 posts
    Helper bee
    • Wedding: October 2013

    @Kfreckles:  based on the model photos I prefer JH8962.  I like the contrasting bodice which i think looks better with the ruffles.

    Post # 4
    239 posts
    Helper bee

    @Khlobee:  i totally agree with you, the bodice looks much nicer on the JH8962.

    Post # 5
    3371 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: May 2014

    I actually prefer the second dress. I’m not fond of the contrasting bodice or sash, I think the organza bodice with the deeper sweetheart is really pretty.

    Post # 7
    4436 posts
    Honey bee
    • Wedding: April 2013

    8962 is gorgeous- the bodice is incredible and I love the coloured sash!

    Post # 9
    3339 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: April 2013 - Rhode Island

    I much prefer JH8962 too.  I think the bodice is prettier and more flattering for most body types.  I also like the platinum sash, even though I probably wouldn’t wear it.  I feel like it breaks up the dress nicely.  JH8050 just doesn’t seem as flattering, and that’s sad when the model is a size 00.

    Post # 10
    3415 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: September 2014 - Lodge

    Both are gorgeous.  The platinum sash is visually appealing and I think if the other dress had a colored sash more would choose it.  They are really similar though.  Although looking at a close up on the JH8962 I like the circular design.  Just something different.

    The topic ‘Why Jim Hjelm JH8962 & not JH8050’ is closed to new replies.

    Find Amazing Vendors