(Closed) With or without?

posted 9 years ago in Reception
Post # 3
Member
952 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: September 2009

I think it looks better without the monogram.

Post # 4
Member
2022 posts
Buzzing bee

I like it better without – cute design!

Post # 5
Member
944 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: June 2009

Even though I love the initials, I say without too. Yes, you are using a lighter orange, but it still competes with the guest’s name. The entire thing though is really cute! Pink and orange are great!!

Post # 6
Member
2404 posts
Buzzing bee
  • Wedding: October 2011

i agree, without the monogram…i also love the color combo of pink and orange! so fresh and pretty!

Post # 7
Member
149 posts
Blushing bee

another for without 🙂

Post # 8
Member
79 posts
Worker bee
  • Wedding: December 1969

Without!

Post # 9
Member
1363 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: June 2009

Ditto! 

Post # 10
Member
997 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: May 2010 - The Pierre Hotel

I’d vote for without as well – I like it nice and simple!

Post # 11
Member
7053 posts
Busy Beekeeper
  • Wedding: July 2010

without!

Post # 12
Member
177 posts
Blushing bee
  • Wedding: October 2009

without the monogram!

Post # 13
Member
596 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: October 2009 - Ceremony: The Kraine Theatre, Reception: Midtown Loft & Terrace

Yeah, I think it’s easier to read without, but the monogram is really cute!

The topic ‘With or without?’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors