Post # 1
My dress has a sweep train but it is definitely on the longer end and will be getting in the way. It’s not super heavy but I really think I like the look of an under bustle better than over. Would it work with my dress? I think I like a French bustle, too, but what would the cost difference be? Does anyone have any examples of dresses that look similar in the back and bustled? Also, any suggestions on how high or low I should have the bustle located? Btw this is from Davids Bridal, Galina T3039. Thanks!
Post # 4
I think it would look nice! I actually prefer under-bustles. Pretty dress!
Post # 5
I think it would be perfect, but I also prefer the under-bustle look.
Post # 7
My train was somewhat similar (not quite a sweep, a little longer, but similar).
This is how it looked bustled. It was a modified under bustle. It tied up instead of using buttons.
Post # 8
I love underbustles, I think that with most dresses it is my favorite look. Your dress would look really beautiful with a similar bustle to mrsjesse.
Post # 9
@mrsjesse: I love your dress and bustle! Thanks for posting the pictures!
Post # 10
Have you maybe considered the “Nacho” bustle? I had a very simple back of my dress too and I went that direction. It basically just makes the back look like a bubble hem, almost no bustle at all. I loved min… but I hate bustles. lol
That being said, I think an underbustle would look good too.