(Closed) Would you be miffed…

posted 6 years ago in Career
Post # 3
774 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: September 2012

If I needed the job, then yes!

Post # 4
4352 posts
Honey bee
  • Wedding: August 2013

I would wait. Sometimes they do it on purpose to see how you act when you’re angry/upset.

Post # 5
3471 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: July 2012 - The Gables Inn, Santa Rosa, CA

It’s rude, but it’s also common– some interviewers do it on purpose to see how you handle the wait.  Some people get impatient and leave, or complain, so they cross their name off the list.  

Post # 6
4324 posts
Honey bee
  • Wedding: January 1992

It’s QUITE rude, but if I needed the job, I’d wait. 

I didn’t know that people actually did this on PURPOSE though. That’s beyond rude to make it intentional!!! *EVERYONE’S* time matters! Not just theirs.

Post # 7
8738 posts
Bumble Beekeeper
  • Wedding: September 2011

Definitely rude and disrespectful to the interviewee. Businesses need to remember that even in bad markets, the purpose of the interview is not only for the company to interview the individual, but also for the individual to find out if the company is a good fit for them.

I would be very turned off as a candidate if someone was that late to interview me. It is also really unprofessional. If a candidate showed up 30 min late that’d be a major black mark against them, I feel that should go both ways. 

The topic ‘Would you be miffed…’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors