(Closed) Would You Go Bigger or Smaller? Pics included!

posted 8 years ago in Rings
  • poll: What Size Stone To Get (ring size 5.5)

    1.5 ct will look great, rock it!

    Stick with 1.25 ct, no bigger

    Go smaller, don't be gaudy!

    I got a larger-than-average stone & I couldn't be happier

    I opted for smaller (we could afford bigger) & I'm so glad I did [please explain]

  • Post # 47
    Member
    1866 posts
    Buzzing bee

    OP, I think your ring is lovely.  But if you want a bigger stone and you guys can afford a bigger stone with the same quality, then I say go for it!

    Post # 48
    Member
    5155 posts
    Bee Keeper
    • Wedding: January 2010

    View original reply
    @Jade33:  My original wedding ring was a design that would not work with another ring – it is a wide crossover/bypass style standalone ring. Plus, it was nickel white gold which it turns out, I cannot wear anymore! I have it tucked away safely in our memory box, though! I have had had entire new sets.

     

    Post # 49
    Member
    768 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: June 2012

    Yeah lol I was thinking you meant as like a “promise” ring or something. But as your wedding ring, totally get the 1.5! I cant wait to see pics!

    Post # 50
    Member
    452 posts
    Helper bee
    • Wedding: December 2012

    i was discussing wedding details with an engaged friend of mine today, and i totally used the phrase “go big or go home!” lol!we were talking dresses, but it still applies 😉

    Post # 51
    Member
    30 posts
    Newbee
    • Wedding: February 2007

    It looks good on you, but peronally I would probably find it too big and not very tasteful on my hand. I’m also a ring size 5.5 and have small hands.

    I think around 0.5 – 0.7 carat looks the best on my hand. I just don’t want it to look flashy or anything…

    That’s just my opinion and preference so it all depends on how you feel about it, though! 🙂

    Post # 52
    Member
    84 posts
    Worker bee
    • Wedding: January 2012

    The 1.5 ct rock looks lovely on you! As long as you love it, who cares what others think! And anyone who tells you it’s gaudy is just jealous…

    Post # 53
    Member
    84 posts
    Worker bee
    • Wedding: January 2012

    Here’s my ring, it’s 1.02 carat. I’m a size 5.25. I feel like my rock is a pretty decent size, but would I have turned down a 1.5 ct rock? No way!!!

     

    Post # 54
    Member
    343 posts
    Helper bee
    • Wedding: October 2013

    I got a 1.5 ct equivalent Moissy (size 7 finger) and I get LOADS of comments than it’s ‘huge’. I do feel slightly self-concious about it, as I have some newly engaged friends and I’d hate if they felt belittled by my ‘huge’ stone (even if it probably cost a fraction of their ‘real’ diamond). The average ring size where I live/work is probably from .3 – .75 ct (1 ct in exceptional cases), so it’s fair enough that mine looks much larger, even on my chubby fingers. I absolutely adore it, thought, and I think the size suits my finger size perfectly.

    It’s up to you; I think 1.25 ct is a good size, or possibly a little large, but if you’re concerned about feeling self-concious you might want to opt on the smaller side. 

    Post # 55
    Member
    783 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: July 2012

    I love it!

    The topic ‘Would You Go Bigger or Smaller? Pics included!’ is closed to new replies.

    Find Amazing Vendors