(Closed) Would you move somewhere that wouldn't allow your pet(s)?

posted 7 years ago in Pets
Post # 3
561 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: September 2013

@Twyla_Smith:  Fiance and I moved about 6 months ago and we didn’t even consider giving up our two cats. I don’t think this guy would have let us anyway.


Post # 4
350 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: July 2013

big no…




When I was younger I had to move back in with my parents to finish college and leave my abusive bf at the time…and I had 2 cats….I had to choose 1 (since my parents had a cat as well)…..




The other cat went to my sister’s, but did get a home…with a great woman…and last I heard she would get bathed in lavendar water and cuddle…this was a cat that was a total spazz and rarely cuddled with anyone…so she found the right person to be with….




But now, with my husband there is no way we would get rid of our pets…..they are our fur babies…


Post # 5
9076 posts
Buzzing Beekeeper
  • Wedding: December 2012

Absolutely not

Post # 6
137 posts
Blushing bee
  • Wedding: December 2018

NO WAY!!!- Pets are a LIFE TIME reasonsibility- people keep forgetting that!!!- It is almost like saying would you give up your children to live somewhere cheaper?- of course not!

Post # 7
445 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: April 2013

Hell no, how could I get rid of this?!?!


Post # 9
3092 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: June 2013

I absolutely would NOT.  My oldest kitty came into my life because of a parent who was moving and could not keep him. 

Post # 10
444 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: September 2013

View original reply
@ellie-b:  Hehe, I have to agree. It looks like he would have tried to eat your face if you told him you were leaving him!

Post # 11
295 posts
Helper bee

I just recently moved in the past month because my SO got a job. He knew I would only follow him if we had a place that would allow two dogs otherwise I would stay behind. It was a major requirement in our apartment searching. 

Post # 12
292 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: December 2014

No. Just no. Even if it was a horrible situation, I’d find a way to keep my cats. It’s what I signed up for when I got them, and they’re worth every penny or moment of stress.

Post # 13
903 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: July 2014

Never. ever! I cant comprehend how pets end up at the pound because “the owners moved and the new apartment doesnt allow pets”. why cant they just find an apartment that does? It just doesnt make sense in my mind…

Post # 14
708 posts
Busy bee

If my circumstances changed such that I could not afford a pet or provide the quality of life they deserve, I would find them a wonderful new home. No shame in that.

Post # 15
1856 posts
Buzzing bee
  • Wedding: March 2013

Nope, definitely not. We paid a $700 pet deposit to have our cats move into our new place – totally worth it.

Post # 16
777 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: September 2015

Not a chance.

We moved from Canada to Australia and paid a LARGE amount of money to import our dog into Australia. And if anyone knows the land down under, they have some pretty strict importation rules.

We have our jobs, friends, family, hobbies….she has us.

She is our life, our heart, our world.

The topic ‘Would you move somewhere that wouldn't allow your pet(s)?’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors