- emmabird
- 4 years ago
- Wedding: November 2017
I mean, In My Humble Opinion you probably don’t need the baby bonus either. Are you honestly saying you couldnt make ends meet without it? Now, that doesn’t mean you’re scamming or taking advantage of the system either since it’s offered to everyone.
But as someone who just got a notice that our gas is getting shut off because we couldn’t pay the bill, I’d be annoyed if my friend who makes over $100k was posting about how they “need” food stamps too.
You’re not doing anything wrong by getting this bonus, I’m just saying you should realize you don’t NEED it to survive like your friend does.
Ok so if she gets $800/month, plus the 33%, she is still raising an infant alone on $13k. If you get zero baby bump you would raise your baby with a partner and 10x as much money.
that is no fault of yours
but still, it’s pretty obvious why she’d lash out. I’d be very anxious if I were her and any conversation about it with you would piss me off, even though I’d know it’s not your fault.
The only right thing to do is be sympathetic and avoid drawing attention to the vast differences in your situations. even though whatever struggle you deal with is real, to her it is still enviable.
Just to clarify the conversation that we had was about how the government will give you 18 months but I was saying really who can afford to stay home that long at 33%? It does make a difference in finances.
My friend mentioned that her baby bonus would be 500-800 a month so she could, which was fine. I just mentioned it’s based off income, and that not everyone gets 500-800 in a baby bonus.
The critical point that you’re missing is that *even with her baby bonus* and any other assistance, her total monthly income is almost certainly *still* less than you’d be making with your husband’s income plus your 33%.
When you say “Who could really afford that?”, you’re missing the point that she *does* manage to get by on that unbelievably low amount of money every single month. This is her life.
So when you make what’s meant as an innocent statement, that you’d take a big hit to your finances by giving up 67% of your income for 18 months, you’re inadvertently implying that your lifestyle is so much above hers that it would be horrible for you to live like her for even a short period of time.
TL;DR: You have to think about all the implications of your statements, not just their surface meaning. As a general rule, if you’re living comfortably, it’s best just not to complain about your finances in any way. There are plenty of people who are worse off than you.
She obviously doesn’t understand how our compensation system works. EI is specifically for people that have worked enough hours in the past year to qualify for employment insurance benefits which they and their employer pay into every pay cheque as a payroll tax. It also maxes out at around $2000 a month so you technically overpay your tax compared to the compensation you receive if you make over around $75,000 a year. There is also a childcare benefit that fluctuates inverse to income. Everyone gets a minimum per child and then it goes up the less your income is. This is where she’s getting a bigger dollar amount. Her saying she’s entitled to it and you aren’t perfectly shows what’s wrong with the thinking of many people in a socialist society. You paid much more in income tax and your EI contributions to cover the slack of poorer families that recieve more back than they ever contributed. I’m fine with the setup but the people that receive more than they contribute really need to understand they are basically taking money right out of more financially successful people’s pockets and maybe act more grateful for our system and those that support despite giving more than they ever receive.
I shared the article on my FB page talking about how the government was trying to glamorize the idea of staying home for 18 months without mentioning it was 33% income take home.
I never complained about my situation.
I shared an article and she messaged me to talk about it, somewhere along the lines something went wrong because she mentioned what she did.
I never complained I mentioned that it’s HARD for a normal family to live off 33% income not everyone makes 100k that was my take.
I didn’t expect it to get this out of control. I told her I understood where she was coming from. Although I don’t agree with some things she said.
My friendship means more to me.
Honestly, part of this feels like when people say they are “colorblind” or “don’t see race”. Seeing race isn’t racist – it’s what you do with that knowledge. Saying you’re colorblind is saying you refuse to acknowledge that there is a difference in how different races have been treated – it’s disavowing their struggles and experiences both current and historical – it’s a failure to acknowledge that there is a systemic failure for some because you see things as completely equal due to being “colorblind”. Being colorblind is part of the problem, not the solution.
You seem to be colorblind to the fact that you and your friend are not equals when it comes economics and family situations. When you say things like “Who could afford that?” you’re basically disavowing that it’s a very real fact of life for your friend and that your position of privilege allows you to CHOOSE for yourself in a way that it doesn’t allow for her. I have a friend paying $1600/month in daycare costs for his two children. That’s more than what your friend gets in benefits and almost double what she would be making in a month if just working. I have another friend who went back to work after two children because she wasn’t happy being a stay at home mom. Her husband makes a good living and she didn’t have to work for financial reasons. She got pregnant with #3 and discovered that she’d actually be losing $50/week by going back to work because of the daycare costs for three kids. The average cost of daycare where I live is over $13,500/year for one infant. Someone with minimal skills to advance in the workforce and no partner to provide additional financial support or childcare likely couldn’t afford to work.
You need to understand your audience does not have the same historical and current life experiences as you and be able to understand how what you say is colored through that filter. A little humility and empathy goes along way, especially when there is such a glaring disparity involved, close friendship or no.
People who live on that income know it’s hard. They do it anyway because they have to. They don’t need to see someone much more fortunate than they are reminding them that it’s not a great situation, and saying that no one who had a choice would choose to live like they do.
Your friend is out of line. Both you and your husband have been paying a lot in taxes and shouldn’t be made to feel bad about getting something back at this time in your lives.
Then again, 33% of her income may not even cover childcare for a 12 month old, so she may actually come out ahead by taking the extra 6 months. So to your point of, how can anyone afford it, for her it may well be the better financial choice. We roughly worked it out, where we live, you, individually, would have to make around 35-40k to make it financially worthwhile to go back to work.
Of course you aren’t jobbing the system, you have paid I to it and you are entitled to it. And yes, I’d be ticked about her coming at me with arguments like that too, especially the insinuatuin that you personally are doing this vs just a certain income bracket. But, I think you should just be the bigger person here. She’s obviously got a lot going on and yes, I’m sure she is jealous of your financial position. I’d just let this go and avoid such discussions in the future, even if she is the one instagating them.
I’m with you though, the 18 month mat leave is just a smokescreen to draw attention away from the fact that little is being done to address the need for affordable childcare, which (I believe) to be a much bigger issue.
The topic ‘You're abusing the system comment from my "friend"’ is closed to new replies.